Verpleegkunde Nummer 4 , pp. 31-34
dec 2020, jaargang 35
Verpleegkunde Nr. 4 , pp. 31-34
dec 2020, jr. 35
Proefschrift

Motiverende gespreksvoering: actieve ingrediënten en verandermechanismen

De vraagstelling van het proefschrift is hoe MGv werkt: wat zijn de actieve ingrediënten en de verandermechanismen van motiverende gespreksvoering? De twee patiëntengroepen laten zien dat de actieve ingrediënten van MGv bestaan uit een wisselende combinatie van zorgverlener- en patiëntfactoren. Actieve ingrediënten ontstaan gedurende een langer lopende interactie tussen patiënt en professional.

Literatuur

  1. Miller WR. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behav Psychother 1983;11:147-72.
  2. Lundahl B, Moleni TR, Burke BL, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:157-68.
  3. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motiverende gespreksvoering. Mensen helpen veranderen. 3de editie. ZP: Ekklesia; 2014.
  4. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
  5. Nock MK. Conceptual and design essentials for evaluating mechanisms of change. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007;31(S3):4S-12S.
  6. Copeland L, McNamara R, Kelson M, et al. Mechanisms of change within motivational interviewing in relation to health behaviors outcomes: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2015;98:401-11.
  7. Miller WR, Rollnick S. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of complex behavioral interventions: impact of treatment fidelity. Comtem Clin Trials 2014;37:234-41.
  8. Barkhof E, Meijer CJ, Sonneville LJ, et al. The effect of motivational interviewing on medication adherence and hospitalisation rates in non-adherent patients with multiepisode schizophrenia. Schizopr Bull 203:39;1242-51.
  9. Minneboo M, Lachman S, Snaterse M, et al. Communitybased lifestyle intervention in patients with Coronary Artery Disease: the RESPONSE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:318-27.
  10. Stake RE. Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
  11. Martin T, Moyers TB, Houck J, et al. Motivational Interviewing Sequential Code for Observing Process Exchanges (SCOPE). Coder’s manual. 2005. Beschikbaar via: https://casaa.unm.edu/download/scope.pdf
  12. Miller WR, Moyers TB, Ernst D, et al. Manual for the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC). Version 2.1.2008. Beschikbaar via: https://casaa.unm.edu/download/misc.pdf
  13. Dobber J, van Meijel B, Barkhof E, et al. Selecting an optimal instrument to identify active ingredients of the motivational interviewing process. J Psychosom Res 2015;78:268-76.
  14. Dobber J, Latour C, van Meijel B, et al. Active ingredients and mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing for medication adherence. A mixed methods study of patient-therapist interaction in patients with schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:78.
  15. Dobber J, Snaterse M, Latour C, et al. Active ingredients and mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing for smoking cessation in patients with a coronary artery disease. A mixed methods study. Submitted 2020.
  16. Hilton CE, Lane C, Johnston LH. Has motivational interviewing fallen into its own premature focus trap? Int J Adv Couns 2016;28:145-58.
  17. Apodaca T, Longabough R. Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and prelimanary evaluation of the evidence. Addiction 2009;104:705-15.
  18. Magill M, Colby SM, Orchowski L, et al. How does brief motivational interviewing change heavy drinking and harm among underage young adult drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2017;85:447-58.
Proefschrift

Motiverende gespreksvoering: actieve ingrediënten en verandermechanismen

De vraagstelling van het proefschrift is hoe MGv werkt: wat zijn de actieve ingrediënten en de verandermechanismen van motiverende gespreksvoering? De twee patiëntengroepen laten zien dat de actieve ingrediënten van MGv bestaan uit een wisselende combinatie van zorgverlener- en patiëntfactoren. Actieve ingrediënten ontstaan gedurende een langer lopende interactie tussen patiënt en professional.

Literatuur

  1. Miller WR. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behav Psychother 1983;11:147-72.
  2. Lundahl B, Moleni TR, Burke BL, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:157-68.
  3. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motiverende gespreksvoering. Mensen helpen veranderen. 3de editie. ZP: Ekklesia; 2014.
  4. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
  5. Nock MK. Conceptual and design essentials for evaluating mechanisms of change. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007;31(S3):4S-12S.
  6. Copeland L, McNamara R, Kelson M, et al. Mechanisms of change within motivational interviewing in relation to health behaviors outcomes: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2015;98:401-11.
  7. Miller WR, Rollnick S. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of complex behavioral interventions: impact of treatment fidelity. Comtem Clin Trials 2014;37:234-41.
  8. Barkhof E, Meijer CJ, Sonneville LJ, et al. The effect of motivational interviewing on medication adherence and hospitalisation rates in non-adherent patients with multiepisode schizophrenia. Schizopr Bull 203:39;1242-51.
  9. Minneboo M, Lachman S, Snaterse M, et al. Communitybased lifestyle intervention in patients with Coronary Artery Disease: the RESPONSE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:318-27.
  10. Stake RE. Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
  11. Martin T, Moyers TB, Houck J, et al. Motivational Interviewing Sequential Code for Observing Process Exchanges (SCOPE). Coder’s manual. 2005. Beschikbaar via: https://casaa.unm.edu/download/scope.pdf
  12. Miller WR, Moyers TB, Ernst D, et al. Manual for the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC). Version 2.1.2008. Beschikbaar via: https://casaa.unm.edu/download/misc.pdf
  13. Dobber J, van Meijel B, Barkhof E, et al. Selecting an optimal instrument to identify active ingredients of the motivational interviewing process. J Psychosom Res 2015;78:268-76.
  14. Dobber J, Latour C, van Meijel B, et al. Active ingredients and mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing for medication adherence. A mixed methods study of patient-therapist interaction in patients with schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:78.
  15. Dobber J, Snaterse M, Latour C, et al. Active ingredients and mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing for smoking cessation in patients with a coronary artery disease. A mixed methods study. Submitted 2020.
  16. Hilton CE, Lane C, Johnston LH. Has motivational interviewing fallen into its own premature focus trap? Int J Adv Couns 2016;28:145-58.
  17. Apodaca T, Longabough R. Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and prelimanary evaluation of the evidence. Addiction 2009;104:705-15.
  18. Magill M, Colby SM, Orchowski L, et al. How does brief motivational interviewing change heavy drinking and harm among underage young adult drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2017;85:447-58.
Over dit artikel
Auteur
Jos Dobber
Over de auteur

Dr. Jos Dobber, ggz-verpleegkundige, onderwijskundige en gezondheidswetenschapper. Hij werkt als onderzoeker en hoofddocent aan de verpleegkunde-opleidingen van de Hogeschool van Amsterdam. Op 1 april 2020 promoveerde hij aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam – Amsterdam UMC op het proefschrift getiteld ‘Motivational interviewing; Active ingredients and mechanisms of change’. De promotoren waren prof. dr. R.J.G. Peters en prof. dr. W.J.M. Scholte op Reimer, de copromotoren waren dr. C.H.M. Latour en prof. dr. B.K.G. van Meijel.

Correspondentieadres: j.t.p.dobber@hva.nl

Printdatum
11 december 2020
E-pubdatum
14 december 2020
ISSN print
0920-3273
ISSN online
2468-2225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24078/vpg.2020.12.126264


Over dit artikel
Auteur
Jos Dobber
Over de auteur

Dr. Jos Dobber, ggz-verpleegkundige, onderwijskundige en gezondheidswetenschapper. Hij werkt als onderzoeker en hoofddocent aan de verpleegkunde-opleidingen van de Hogeschool van Amsterdam. Op 1 april 2020 promoveerde hij aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam – Amsterdam UMC op het proefschrift getiteld ‘Motivational interviewing; Active ingredients and mechanisms of change’. De promotoren waren prof. dr. R.J.G. Peters en prof. dr. W.J.M. Scholte op Reimer, de copromotoren waren dr. C.H.M. Latour en prof. dr. B.K.G. van Meijel.

Correspondentieadres: j.t.p.dobber@hva.nl

Printdatum
11 december 2020
E-pubdatum
14 december 2020
ISSN print
0920-3273
ISSN online
2468-2225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24078/vpg.2020.12.126264