Verpleegkunde Nummer 4 , pp. 24-30
dec 2018, jaargang 33
Verpleegkunde Nr. 4 , pp. 24-30
dec 2018, jr. 33
Proefschrift

Toegepaste klinimetrie op de afdeling Intensive care

Zorgprofessionals gebruiken metingen om een diagnose te stellen, om het effect van de behandeling te evalueren en ten slotte om een prognose te stellen. Van opname tot ontslag of overlijden; elke fase in de behandeling van de kritiek-zieke patiënt op de intensive care unit (ICU) vereist metingen. Dit proefschrift heeft de validiteit, betrouwbaarheid en accuratesse van een aantal meetinstrumenten op de ICU beoordeeld.

Literatuur

  1. Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM. Inleiding in evidence-based medicine. Derde herziene druk. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2008. p. 134-149.
  2. Bouter LM, van Dongen MCJM, Zielhuis GA. In: Diagnostiek en prognostiek. Epidemiologisch onderzoek Opzet en interpretatie. 5e herziene druk ed. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2005. p. 245-95.
  3. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-45.
  4. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Validity. In: Health measurement scales a practical guide to their development and use. Third edition ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 172-193.
  5. Gelinas C, Puntillo KA, Joffe AM, et al. A validated approach to evaluating psychometric properties of pain assessment tools for use in nonverbal critically ill adults. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013;34:153-68.
  6. Puntillo KA, Max A, Timsit JF, et al. Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The Europain(R) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:39-47.
  7. Desbiens NA, Wu AW, Broste SK, et al. Pain and satisfaction with pain control in seriously ill hospitalized adults: findings from the SUPPORT research investigations. Crit Care Med 1996;24:1953-61.
  8. Nelson JE, Meier DE, Oei EJ, et al. Self-reported symptom experience of critically ill cancer patients receiving intensive care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:277-82.
  9. Li DT, Puntillo K. A pilot study on coexisting symptoms in intensive care patients. Appl Nurs Res 2006;19:216-9.
  10. Puntillo KA, Morris AB, Thompson CL, et al. Pain behaviors observed during six common procedures: results from Thunder Project II. Crit Care Med 2004;32:421-7.
  11. Payen JF, Bosson JL, Chanques G, et al. Pain assessment is associated with decreased duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a post hoc analysis of the DOLOREA study. Anesthesiology 2009;111: 1308-16.
  12. Puntillo K, Pasero C, Li D, et al. Evaluation of pain in ICU patients. Chest 2009:135:1069-74.
  13. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2013;41:263-306.
  14. Peng Z, Li H, Zhang C, et al. A retrospective study of chronic post-surgical pain following thoracic surgery: prevalence, risk factors, incidence of neuropathic component, and impact on quality of life. PLoS One 2014;9:e90014.
  15. Baron R, Binder A, Biniek R, et al. Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version. Ger Med Sci 2015;13:Doc19.
  16. Pudas-Tahka SM, Axelin A, Aantaa R, et al. Pain assessment tools for unconscious or sedated intensive care patients: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:946-56.
  17. Spijkstra JJ, et al. Herziene richtlijn analgesie en sedatie voor volwassen patiënten op de intensive care. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Intensive Care (NVIC). 2013.
  18. Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL, et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit Care Med 2001;29:2258-63.
  19. Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, et al. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care 2006;15:420-7.
  20. Gelinas C, Johnston C. Pain assessment in the critically ill ventilated adult: validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and physiologic indicators. Clin J Pain 2007;23:497-505.
  21. Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA. Item selection and content validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for non-verbal adults. J Adv Nurs 2009;65: 203-16.
  22. Gelinas C, Harel F, Fillion L, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the critical-care pain observation tool for the detection of pain in intubated adults after cardiac surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;37:58-67.
  23. Rijkenberg S, Stilma W, Endeman H, et al. Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. J Crit Care 2015;30:167-72.
  24. Rijkenberg S, Stilma W, Bosman RJ, et al. Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery: comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017;31:1227-34.
  25. Stilma W, Rijkenberg S, Feijen HM, et al. Validation of the Dutch version of the critical-care pain observation tool. Nurs Crit Care 2015; epub aahead of print.
  26. Rijkenberg S, van der Voort PH. Can the critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT) be used to assess pain in delirious ICU patients? J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E285-7.
  27. Pickham D, Helfenbein E, Shinn JA, et al. High prevalence of corrected QT interval prolongation in acutely ill patients is associated with mortality: results of the QT in Practice (QTIP) study. Crit Care Med 2012;40:394-9.
  28. Hoogstraaten E, Rijkenberg S, van der Voort PH. Corrected QT-interval prolongation and variability in intensive care patients. J Crit Care 2014;29:835-9.
  29. Berger RD, Kasper EK, Baughman KL, et al. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability: novel evidence for repolarization lability in ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1997;96:1557-65.
  30. Janssen GH, Rijkenberg S, van der Voort PH. Validation of continuous QTc measurement in critically ill patients. J Electrocardiol 2016;49:81-6.
  31. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
  32. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al., Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-67.
  33. Van Steen SC, Rijkenberg S, Limpens J, et al. The clinical benefits and accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring systems in critically ill patients - a systematic scoping review. Sensors (Basel) 2017;17(1).
  34. Finfer S, Wernerman J, Preiser JC, et al. Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults. Crit Care 2013;17:229.
  35. Wernerman J, |Desaive T, Finfer S, et al. Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting. Crit Care 2014;18:226.
  36. Boom DT, Sechterberger MK, Rijkenberg S, et al. Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2014;18:453.
  37. Rijkenberg S, van Steen SC, DeVries JH, et al. Accuracy and reliability of a continuous glucose measurement device in critically ill patients. J Clin Monit Comput 2018;32:953-64.
  38. Phillips C. Relationships between duration of practice, educational level, and perception of barriers to implement evidence-based practice among critical care nurses. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:224-32.
  39. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71-2.
  40. Ubbink DT, Guyatt GH, Vermeulen H. Framework of policy recommendations for implementation of evidence-based practice: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open 2013;3(1).
  41. Oude RK, Zwolsman SE, Ubbink DT, et al. Tools to assess evidence-based practice behaviour among healthcare professionals. Evid Based Med 2013;18:129-38.
  42. Swaine-Verdier A, Doward LC, Hagell P, et al. Adapting quality of life instruments. Value Health 2004;7 Suppl 1:S27-30.
Proefschrift

Toegepaste klinimetrie op de afdeling Intensive care

Zorgprofessionals gebruiken metingen om een diagnose te stellen, om het effect van de behandeling te evalueren en ten slotte om een prognose te stellen. Van opname tot ontslag of overlijden; elke fase in de behandeling van de kritiek-zieke patiënt op de intensive care unit (ICU) vereist metingen. Dit proefschrift heeft de validiteit, betrouwbaarheid en accuratesse van een aantal meetinstrumenten op de ICU beoordeeld.

Literatuur

  1. Offringa M, Assendelft WJJ, Scholten RJPM. Inleiding in evidence-based medicine. Derde herziene druk. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2008. p. 134-149.
  2. Bouter LM, van Dongen MCJM, Zielhuis GA. In: Diagnostiek en prognostiek. Epidemiologisch onderzoek Opzet en interpretatie. 5e herziene druk ed. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2005. p. 245-95.
  3. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-45.
  4. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Validity. In: Health measurement scales a practical guide to their development and use. Third edition ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 172-193.
  5. Gelinas C, Puntillo KA, Joffe AM, et al. A validated approach to evaluating psychometric properties of pain assessment tools for use in nonverbal critically ill adults. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013;34:153-68.
  6. Puntillo KA, Max A, Timsit JF, et al. Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The Europain(R) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:39-47.
  7. Desbiens NA, Wu AW, Broste SK, et al. Pain and satisfaction with pain control in seriously ill hospitalized adults: findings from the SUPPORT research investigations. Crit Care Med 1996;24:1953-61.
  8. Nelson JE, Meier DE, Oei EJ, et al. Self-reported symptom experience of critically ill cancer patients receiving intensive care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:277-82.
  9. Li DT, Puntillo K. A pilot study on coexisting symptoms in intensive care patients. Appl Nurs Res 2006;19:216-9.
  10. Puntillo KA, Morris AB, Thompson CL, et al. Pain behaviors observed during six common procedures: results from Thunder Project II. Crit Care Med 2004;32:421-7.
  11. Payen JF, Bosson JL, Chanques G, et al. Pain assessment is associated with decreased duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a post hoc analysis of the DOLOREA study. Anesthesiology 2009;111: 1308-16.
  12. Puntillo K, Pasero C, Li D, et al. Evaluation of pain in ICU patients. Chest 2009:135:1069-74.
  13. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2013;41:263-306.
  14. Peng Z, Li H, Zhang C, et al. A retrospective study of chronic post-surgical pain following thoracic surgery: prevalence, risk factors, incidence of neuropathic component, and impact on quality of life. PLoS One 2014;9:e90014.
  15. Baron R, Binder A, Biniek R, et al. Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version. Ger Med Sci 2015;13:Doc19.
  16. Pudas-Tahka SM, Axelin A, Aantaa R, et al. Pain assessment tools for unconscious or sedated intensive care patients: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:946-56.
  17. Spijkstra JJ, et al. Herziene richtlijn analgesie en sedatie voor volwassen patiënten op de intensive care. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Intensive Care (NVIC). 2013.
  18. Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL, et al. Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale. Crit Care Med 2001;29:2258-63.
  19. Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, et al. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care 2006;15:420-7.
  20. Gelinas C, Johnston C. Pain assessment in the critically ill ventilated adult: validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and physiologic indicators. Clin J Pain 2007;23:497-505.
  21. Gelinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA. Item selection and content validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for non-verbal adults. J Adv Nurs 2009;65: 203-16.
  22. Gelinas C, Harel F, Fillion L, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the critical-care pain observation tool for the detection of pain in intubated adults after cardiac surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;37:58-67.
  23. Rijkenberg S, Stilma W, Endeman H, et al. Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. J Crit Care 2015;30:167-72.
  24. Rijkenberg S, Stilma W, Bosman RJ, et al. Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery: comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017;31:1227-34.
  25. Stilma W, Rijkenberg S, Feijen HM, et al. Validation of the Dutch version of the critical-care pain observation tool. Nurs Crit Care 2015; epub aahead of print.
  26. Rijkenberg S, van der Voort PH. Can the critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT) be used to assess pain in delirious ICU patients? J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E285-7.
  27. Pickham D, Helfenbein E, Shinn JA, et al. High prevalence of corrected QT interval prolongation in acutely ill patients is associated with mortality: results of the QT in Practice (QTIP) study. Crit Care Med 2012;40:394-9.
  28. Hoogstraaten E, Rijkenberg S, van der Voort PH. Corrected QT-interval prolongation and variability in intensive care patients. J Crit Care 2014;29:835-9.
  29. Berger RD, Kasper EK, Baughman KL, et al. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability: novel evidence for repolarization lability in ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1997;96:1557-65.
  30. Janssen GH, Rijkenberg S, van der Voort PH. Validation of continuous QTc measurement in critically ill patients. J Electrocardiol 2016;49:81-6.
  31. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
  32. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al., Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-67.
  33. Van Steen SC, Rijkenberg S, Limpens J, et al. The clinical benefits and accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring systems in critically ill patients - a systematic scoping review. Sensors (Basel) 2017;17(1).
  34. Finfer S, Wernerman J, Preiser JC, et al. Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults. Crit Care 2013;17:229.
  35. Wernerman J, |Desaive T, Finfer S, et al. Continuous glucose control in the ICU: report of a 2013 round table meeting. Crit Care 2014;18:226.
  36. Boom DT, Sechterberger MK, Rijkenberg S, et al. Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point-of-care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2014;18:453.
  37. Rijkenberg S, van Steen SC, DeVries JH, et al. Accuracy and reliability of a continuous glucose measurement device in critically ill patients. J Clin Monit Comput 2018;32:953-64.
  38. Phillips C. Relationships between duration of practice, educational level, and perception of barriers to implement evidence-based practice among critical care nurses. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:224-32.
  39. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71-2.
  40. Ubbink DT, Guyatt GH, Vermeulen H. Framework of policy recommendations for implementation of evidence-based practice: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open 2013;3(1).
  41. Oude RK, Zwolsman SE, Ubbink DT, et al. Tools to assess evidence-based practice behaviour among healthcare professionals. Evid Based Med 2013;18:129-38.
  42. Swaine-Verdier A, Doward LC, Hagell P, et al. Adapting quality of life instruments. Value Health 2004;7 Suppl 1:S27-30.
Over dit artikel
Auteur
Saskia Rijkenberg
Over de auteur

Saskia Rijkenberg behaalde in 2003 haar bachelordiploma hbo-V duaal en werkte een jaar als verpleegkundige op de afdeling Cardiologie van het OLVG te Amsterdam alvorens ze startte met de vervolgopleiding tot Cardiac Care verpleegkundige. Na het afronden van deze opleiding heeft ze de Master Evidence Based Practice (EBP) in Health Care gevolgd en afgerond. Deze opleiding gaf haar de mogelijkheid om in 2009 aan de slag te gaan als research coördinator en verpleegkundig onderzoeker op de intensive care unit (ICU). Dit combineerde ze vijf jaar met de functie van klinisch epidemioloog bij het Leerhuis van OLVG locatie Oost.
Daarnaast heeft ze in 2013 een wetenschapsblad voor verpleegkundigen, Wetenschap@OLVG Verpleegkunde, opgericht (https://www.olvg.nl/wetenschapolvg-verpleegkunde).

In 2015 is ze volledig op de ICU gaan werken zodat ze zich kon richten op haar proefschrift, dat ze 12 januari 2018 verdedigde aan de Tilburg University. Het onderzoek werd begeleid door promotoren prof. dr. P.H.J. van der Voort en prof. dr. B.J.M. van der Meer. Het volledige proefschrift is te raadplegen op www.proefschriftenverpleegkunde.nl/publicatie-zoeken/entry/193.


Correspondentieadres: s.rijkenberg@olvg.nl

Printdatum
14 december 2018
E-pubdatum
17 december 2018
ISSN print
0920-3273
ISSN online
2468-2225


Over dit artikel
Auteur
Saskia Rijkenberg
Over de auteur

Saskia Rijkenberg behaalde in 2003 haar bachelordiploma hbo-V duaal en werkte een jaar als verpleegkundige op de afdeling Cardiologie van het OLVG te Amsterdam alvorens ze startte met de vervolgopleiding tot Cardiac Care verpleegkundige. Na het afronden van deze opleiding heeft ze de Master Evidence Based Practice (EBP) in Health Care gevolgd en afgerond. Deze opleiding gaf haar de mogelijkheid om in 2009 aan de slag te gaan als research coördinator en verpleegkundig onderzoeker op de intensive care unit (ICU). Dit combineerde ze vijf jaar met de functie van klinisch epidemioloog bij het Leerhuis van OLVG locatie Oost.
Daarnaast heeft ze in 2013 een wetenschapsblad voor verpleegkundigen, Wetenschap@OLVG Verpleegkunde, opgericht (https://www.olvg.nl/wetenschapolvg-verpleegkunde).

In 2015 is ze volledig op de ICU gaan werken zodat ze zich kon richten op haar proefschrift, dat ze 12 januari 2018 verdedigde aan de Tilburg University. Het onderzoek werd begeleid door promotoren prof. dr. P.H.J. van der Voort en prof. dr. B.J.M. van der Meer. Het volledige proefschrift is te raadplegen op www.proefschriftenverpleegkunde.nl/publicatie-zoeken/entry/193.


Correspondentieadres: s.rijkenberg@olvg.nl

Printdatum
14 december 2018
E-pubdatum
17 december 2018
ISSN print
0920-3273
ISSN online
2468-2225