Verpleegkunde Nummer 4 , pp. 21-25
dec 2017, jaargang 32
Verpleegkunde Nr. 4 , pp. 21-25
dec 2017, jr. 32
Shortpaper

Zelfmanagement­­ondersteuning: geen one-size-fits-all

Patiënten met een chronische aandoening moeten omgaan met zowel het medische, emotionele als het sociale aspect van het leven met hun aandoening. Dit wordt ook wel aangeduid als zelfmanagement. Zelfmanagement wordt gezien als een belangrijk element om gezondheidsuitkomsten en kwaliteit van leven te verbeteren, en de kosten van de gezondheidszorg te beheersen.
Dit proefschrift biedt inzicht in de belangrijkste determinanten van zelfmanagement en beschrijft de ontwikkeling en validering van de praktisch toepasbare Zelfmanagement Screening-vragenlijst voor het meten van deze kenmerken in de huisartsenpraktijk.

Literatuur

  1. Effing T, Monninkhof EM, van der Valk PD, et al. Selfmanagement education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD002990.
  2. Orrow G, Kinmonth AL, Sanderson S, et al. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, BMJ 2012;344:e1389.
  3. Van der Meer V, Bakker MJ, van den Hout WB, et al. Internet-based self-management plus education compared with usual care in asthma: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:110-20.
  4. Lu Z, Cao S, Chai Y, et al. Effectiveness of interventions for hypertension care in the community – a meta-analysis of controlled studies in China. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:216.
  5. Da Silva D. Helping people help themselves. A review of the evidence considering whether it is worthwhile to support self-management. London: Health Foundation, 2011.
  6. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 2005;40:1918-30.
  7. Granger BB, Ekman I, Hernandez AF, et al. Results of the Chronic Heart Failure Intervention to Improve MEdication Adherence study: a randomized intervention in high-risk patients. Am Heart J 2015;169:539-48.
  8. Trappenburg JC, Monninkhof EM, Bourbeau J, et al. Effect of an action plan with ongoing support by a case manager on exacerbation-related outcome in patients with COPD: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2011;66:977-84.
  9. Bobrie G, Postel-Vinay N, Delonca J, et al. Selfmeasurement and self-titration in hypertension: a pilot telemedicine study. Am J Hypertens 2007;20:1314-20.
  10. Eikelenboom N, Smeele I, Faber M, et al. Validation of Self-Management Screening (SeMaS), a tool to facilitate personalised counselling and support of patients with chronic diseases. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:165.
  11. Eikelenboom N, van Lieshout J, Jacobs A, et al. Effectiveness of personalised support for self- management in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2016;66:e354-61.
  12. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, et al. Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes selfmanagement. Health Psychol 2004;23:58-66.
  13. Schreurs PJG, van de Willige G, Brosschot JF, et al. De Utrechtse Copinglijst: UCL. Omgaan met problemen en gebeurtenissen. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1993.
  14. Terluin B, van Marwijk HW, Ader HJ, et al. The FourDimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatr 2006;6:34.
  15. Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr 1978;6:160-70.
  16. Funch DP, Marshall JR, Gebhardt GP. Assessment of a short scale to measure social support. Soc Sci Med 1986;23:337-44.
  17. Salen BA, Spangfort EV, Nygren AL, et al. The Disability Rating Index: an instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1423-35.
  18. Van der Burgt M, Verhulst F. Doen en blijven doen. Houten: Springer, 2009.
  19. Segal-Isaacson CJ, Wylie-Rosett J, Gans KM. Validation of a short dietary assessment questionnaire: the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Participants short version (REAP-S). Diabetes Educ 2004;30:774, 776, 778 passim.
  20. Topolski TD, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL, et al. The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis 2006;3:A118.
  21. Yaroch AL, Nebeling L, Thompson FE, et al. Baseline design elements and sample characteristics for seven sites participating in the Nutrition Working Group of the Behavior Change Consortium. J Nutr 2008;138:185S-92S.
  22. Jansink R, Braspenning J, Laurant M, et al. Minimal improvement of nurses’ motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Fam Pract 2013;14:44.
  23. McAndrew LM, Napolitano MA, Pogach LM, et al. The impact of self-monitoring of blood glucose on a behavioral weight loss intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2013;39:397-405.
  24. Noordman J, Koopmans B, Korevaar JC, et al. Exploring lifestyle counselling in routine primary care consultations: the professionals’ role. Fam Pract 2013;30:332-40.
  25. van Dillen SM, Hiddink GJ. To what extent do primary care practice nurses act as case managers lifestyle counselling regarding weight management? A systematic review. BMC Fam Pract 2014;15:197.
  26. Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, et al. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage 2007; 30:21-9.
  27. Coulter A, Entwistle VA, Eccles A, et al. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD010523.
Shortpaper

Zelfmanagement­­ondersteuning: geen one-size-fits-all

Patiënten met een chronische aandoening moeten omgaan met zowel het medische, emotionele als het sociale aspect van het leven met hun aandoening. Dit wordt ook wel aangeduid als zelfmanagement. Zelfmanagement wordt gezien als een belangrijk element om gezondheidsuitkomsten en kwaliteit van leven te verbeteren, en de kosten van de gezondheidszorg te beheersen.
Dit proefschrift biedt inzicht in de belangrijkste determinanten van zelfmanagement en beschrijft de ontwikkeling en validering van de praktisch toepasbare Zelfmanagement Screening-vragenlijst voor het meten van deze kenmerken in de huisartsenpraktijk.

Literatuur

  1. Effing T, Monninkhof EM, van der Valk PD, et al. Selfmanagement education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD002990.
  2. Orrow G, Kinmonth AL, Sanderson S, et al. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, BMJ 2012;344:e1389.
  3. Van der Meer V, Bakker MJ, van den Hout WB, et al. Internet-based self-management plus education compared with usual care in asthma: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:110-20.
  4. Lu Z, Cao S, Chai Y, et al. Effectiveness of interventions for hypertension care in the community – a meta-analysis of controlled studies in China. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:216.
  5. Da Silva D. Helping people help themselves. A review of the evidence considering whether it is worthwhile to support self-management. London: Health Foundation, 2011.
  6. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 2005;40:1918-30.
  7. Granger BB, Ekman I, Hernandez AF, et al. Results of the Chronic Heart Failure Intervention to Improve MEdication Adherence study: a randomized intervention in high-risk patients. Am Heart J 2015;169:539-48.
  8. Trappenburg JC, Monninkhof EM, Bourbeau J, et al. Effect of an action plan with ongoing support by a case manager on exacerbation-related outcome in patients with COPD: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2011;66:977-84.
  9. Bobrie G, Postel-Vinay N, Delonca J, et al. Selfmeasurement and self-titration in hypertension: a pilot telemedicine study. Am J Hypertens 2007;20:1314-20.
  10. Eikelenboom N, Smeele I, Faber M, et al. Validation of Self-Management Screening (SeMaS), a tool to facilitate personalised counselling and support of patients with chronic diseases. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:165.
  11. Eikelenboom N, van Lieshout J, Jacobs A, et al. Effectiveness of personalised support for self- management in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2016;66:e354-61.
  12. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, et al. Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes selfmanagement. Health Psychol 2004;23:58-66.
  13. Schreurs PJG, van de Willige G, Brosschot JF, et al. De Utrechtse Copinglijst: UCL. Omgaan met problemen en gebeurtenissen. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1993.
  14. Terluin B, van Marwijk HW, Ader HJ, et al. The FourDimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatr 2006;6:34.
  15. Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr 1978;6:160-70.
  16. Funch DP, Marshall JR, Gebhardt GP. Assessment of a short scale to measure social support. Soc Sci Med 1986;23:337-44.
  17. Salen BA, Spangfort EV, Nygren AL, et al. The Disability Rating Index: an instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1423-35.
  18. Van der Burgt M, Verhulst F. Doen en blijven doen. Houten: Springer, 2009.
  19. Segal-Isaacson CJ, Wylie-Rosett J, Gans KM. Validation of a short dietary assessment questionnaire: the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Participants short version (REAP-S). Diabetes Educ 2004;30:774, 776, 778 passim.
  20. Topolski TD, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL, et al. The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis 2006;3:A118.
  21. Yaroch AL, Nebeling L, Thompson FE, et al. Baseline design elements and sample characteristics for seven sites participating in the Nutrition Working Group of the Behavior Change Consortium. J Nutr 2008;138:185S-92S.
  22. Jansink R, Braspenning J, Laurant M, et al. Minimal improvement of nurses’ motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Fam Pract 2013;14:44.
  23. McAndrew LM, Napolitano MA, Pogach LM, et al. The impact of self-monitoring of blood glucose on a behavioral weight loss intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2013;39:397-405.
  24. Noordman J, Koopmans B, Korevaar JC, et al. Exploring lifestyle counselling in routine primary care consultations: the professionals’ role. Fam Pract 2013;30:332-40.
  25. van Dillen SM, Hiddink GJ. To what extent do primary care practice nurses act as case managers lifestyle counselling regarding weight management? A systematic review. BMC Fam Pract 2014;15:197.
  26. Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, et al. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage 2007; 30:21-9.
  27. Coulter A, Entwistle VA, Eccles A, et al. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD010523.
Over dit artikel
Auteur
Nathalie Eikelenboom
Over de auteur

Dr. Nathalie Eikelenboom is biomedisch wetenschapper. In de periode 2011-2016 deed zij haar promotieonderzoek bij het Radboudumc, afdeling IQ Healthcare, te Nijmegen. Haar promotor was prof. dr. Michel Wensing, en haar copromotoren dr. Ivo Smeele en dr. Jan van Lieshout. Zij combineerde het promotieonderzoek met het projectleiderschap op diverse projecten rond zelfmanagement, e-health en persoonsgerichte zorg bij Zorggroep DOH in Eindhoven. Deze functie heeft zij nu nog steeds.

Correspondentieadres: n.eikelenboom@zorggroepdoh.nl

E-pubdatum
21 december 2017
ISSN online
2468-2225


Over dit artikel
Auteur
Nathalie Eikelenboom
Over de auteur

Dr. Nathalie Eikelenboom is biomedisch wetenschapper. In de periode 2011-2016 deed zij haar promotieonderzoek bij het Radboudumc, afdeling IQ Healthcare, te Nijmegen. Haar promotor was prof. dr. Michel Wensing, en haar copromotoren dr. Ivo Smeele en dr. Jan van Lieshout. Zij combineerde het promotieonderzoek met het projectleiderschap op diverse projecten rond zelfmanagement, e-health en persoonsgerichte zorg bij Zorggroep DOH in Eindhoven. Deze functie heeft zij nu nog steeds.

Correspondentieadres: n.eikelenboom@zorggroepdoh.nl

E-pubdatum
21 december 2017
ISSN online
2468-2225